Twitter users boast about voting for dead gorilla Harambe on Twitter and post the proof
In response, many expressed fury at seeing votes 'wasted' on the animal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Americans who claim to have voted for the late gorilla Harambe to become the 45th President of the United States are posting photos of their ballots on social media.
In the wake of Donald Trump’s shock White House victory, photos flooded Twitter showing voters who had used the write-in section of their ballots to vote for the gorilla.
Some said Harambe’s name appeared on as many as 11,000 votes, a claim that has yet to be substantiated.
The gorilla’s death sparked outrage in May after he was shot when a toddler fell into his enclosure at Cincinnati Zoo.
However, many users expressed their fury at seeing votes “wasted” on a dead animal.
Posting a picture of a completed ballot to social media is a contentious issue in the US. Eric Trump came under fire for tweeting a photo of his completed ballot, which constitutes a violation of New York State law.
US voting regulations are set at a state level or lower, so laws in this area vary, although most states carry criminal penalties for those who post photographs of their ballots.
Despite some states allowing write-in candidates, these votes are believed to make little impact on the final result.
Eight states did not allow space for write-ins in 2016's elections while in 32 others, write-in candidates had to file with the state prior to the election to be counted as official candidates.
At the time of writing, the popular vote was still being counted with Hillary Clinton holding 58,874,061 votes to Donald Trump’s 58,839,749.
However, the US electoral college system means a candidate can win the popular vote while ultimately losing out on the presidency.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments