Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump administration won't release 9/11 'secrets' to victims' families

Attorney general says even discussing justification for documents' secrecy could cause 'serious damage' to national security

Alex Woodward
New York
Thursday 16 April 2020 13:02 EDT
Comments
9/11: Trump repeats dubious claim that he was at ground zero

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump's administration refuses to release documents related to the 9/11 terror attacks to block families of victims from obtaining evidence in their civil lawsuit against Saudi Arabia.

In New York federal court filings this week, US Attorney General William Barr and intelligence director Richard Grenell invoked unprecedented claims that the documents remain state secrets, which must be locked down to "protect the national security interests" of the US government, despite the president's pledge to help families in the case.

The filings suggest that exposing Saudi ties to the attacks could pose "exceptionally grave damage" to national security, the administration said, though the contents of those documents remain a mystery.

Mr Grennell, who was appointed by the president in February, wrote that the documents contain "highly sensitive and classified national security information concerning foreign government information, intelligence activities, sources and methods, and information concerning foreign relations and foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources" — all of which "must be protected because its disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage" to the US, he said.

Attorney General Barr told the court that even public discussion of and justification for the documents' secrecy must also be kept secret, arguing that a discussion "would reveal information that could cause the very harms my assertion of the state secrets privilege is intended to prevent."

Plaintiffs had entered the lawsuit in 2017 to determine the relationships between 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were from Saudi Arabia, and Saudi officials with ties to al Qaeda.

Though connections among some of those men have been publicly known for years through the release of some documents shared in a 9/11 Commission report in 2004, families have sought additional unredacted documents that White House officials have long sought to keep secret.

Following a 2019 White House meeting with victims' families, the president had reportedly pledged to grant families access to documents in the case, ProPublica reported. The White House did not respond to requests for comment.

After that meeting, Department of Justice officials agreed to release the name of one Saudi official linked to the case via FBI documents that had been partially declassified.

Jon Stewart receives standing ovation after blasting US congress for 'empty' 9/11 victims hearing

But the filing could only be read by the plaintiffs' lawyers under a protected court filing. On 12 September, the attorney general insisted the documents' exposure risks "significant harm to national security."

This week, the attorney general argued that the "state secrets" may contain information about the subject of a national security investigation, the results or sources from an investigation, and "information received from a foreign government" through the course of an investigation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in