US judge throws out case against Greenpeace activists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Greenpeace was celebrating an unexpected victory against the Bush administration yesterday after the latest attempt to press criminal charges against the organisation over its civil disobedience tactics was summarily thrown out of court by a federal judge in Florida.
The Justice Department, which has made no secret of its desire to come down hard on activists who stage protests at military bases, ports and other sensitive security locations, had attempted to prosecute Greenpeace under an obscure 19th-century maritime law intended to prevent prostitutes soliciting business from passing ships.
The case concerned a protest in April 2002 in which two activists left the port of Miami-Dade in a rubber dinghy and boarded a ship which was carrying mahogany from the Brazilian rainforest. Six Greenpeace members were charged with misdemeanours. A year later the government convened a grand jury to press criminal conspiracy charges against Greenpeace under a 1872 statute against "sailor-mongering".
Civil liberties groups and prominent politicians, including the former vice-president Al Gore, deplored the prosecution as an infringement of Greenpeace's right to free speech, but the case moved to trial regardless. Then, to everyone's surprise, Judge Adalberto Jordan threw out the case on the second day - a highly unusual occurrence when a jury has been empanelled and witnesses have begun testifying. Since the jury never got to consider the case, the government does not have the right to appeal.
Judge Jordan did not say the charges were frivolous but took refuge in a literal interpretation of the law. Since the Greenpeace action took place six miles off shore, he said, the mahogany-carrying ship APL Jade could not be said to be "about to arrive" as the sailor-mongering statute specifies. However, he warned Greenpeace that the law remained on the books and might be a threat to the organisation in future.
While Greenpeace activists celebrated, the group's North American executive director, John Passacantando, issued a statement. "America's tradition of free speech won a victory today but our liberties are still not safe," he said. "The Bush administration and its allies seem bent on stifling our tradition of civil protest, a tradition that has made this country stronger throughout its history."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments