Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US Supreme Court refuses to lift restrictions on carrying concealed handguns in California

Second straight year the country’s top court denies acting on Californian law that prevents people from carrying firearms in public places

Tuesday 06 November 2018 06:39 EST
Comments
The Supreme Court is refusing a new invitation to rule on gun rights
The Supreme Court is refusing a new invitation to rule on gun rights (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The US Supreme court has refused to hear a challenge on California’s limits on carrying handguns in public.

For the second straight year the country’s top court has denied acting on Californian law that prevents people from carrying firearms in public places.

The law bars people from carrying firearms outside the home but local sheriffs can issue permits to carry a concealed gun in public places if applicants show "good cause."

It is left up to individual sheriffs to determine what constitutes "good cause."

In the case, gun owners James Rothery and Andrea Hoffman – who wanted to carry their weapons in public – sued the state and Sacramento County in 2008, saying the process for granting permits for carrying a concealed handgun was "arbitrary and capricious" and violated their right to bear arms under the US Constitution's Second Amendment.

They also said the law violated their 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law.

Like the case turned away by the Supreme Court last year, this one was an appeal of a lower court decision upholding a local sheriff's refusal to issue a permit.

The court's decision continued its reluctance to step into a national debate over gun control which has been reignited by a series of mass shootings including a recent massacre at a Pittsburgh synagogue that killed 11 people on 27 October. It has not taken up a major gun case since 2010.

Agencies contributed to this report

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in