Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US election: How three falsehoods have spread online

There have been false claims of ballot harvesting and planned violence by Black Lives Matter protestors

Davey Alba,Kellen Browning
Saturday 31 October 2020 08:35 EDT
Comments
Trump says he will 'vanquish' coronavirus vaccine

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Falsehoods about Tuesday’s election have overwhelmed local election officials, who said they were dealing with “tsunamis of misinformation,” have lost sleep and were working extra long hours.

The officials told us they were dealing with several common flavours of election-related misinformation. So we decided to track three categories of the rumours they had encountered using CrowdTangle, a Facebook-owned analytics tool, and then focused on the spread of one of the lies in each of the categories. 

We also recorded the volume of tweets about the rumours we followed using BuzzSumo, another analytics tool.

The data showed how a single rumour pushing a false narrative could rapidly gain traction on Facebook and Twitter, generating tens of thousands of shares and comments. That has made the misinformation particularly hard for elections officials to fight.

“The true costs of misinformation are not paid by platform companies,” said Joan Donovan, research director at Harvard University’s Shorenstein Centre. “They are paid by everyone else who has to deal with the aftermath.”

A spokesman for Facebook, Andy Stone, said that it prohibits voter interference, is working with fact-checking organisations and has introduced a voter information hub of accurate information.

Twitter said it did not create any specific Twitter Moments explaining these particular rumours but does aim to proactively debunk false claims and provide information about voting by mail.

Here’s what we found.

False claims of ballot “harvesting”

This misinformation features the unproven assertion that ballots are being “harvested,” or collected and dropped off in bulk by unauthorised people.

In the example we focused on, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., was falsely accused last month of being engaged in or connected to systematic illegal ballot harvesting.

There were 3,959 public Facebook posts sharing this rumour, according to our analysis. Those posts generated 953,032 likes, comments and shares. Among those who shared the lie were two pro-Trump Facebook groups targeting Minnesota residents, as well as President Donald Trump himself. At least 26,300 tweets also discussed the falsehood.

Jeremy Slevin, a spokesperson for Omar, said in an emailed statement that there was no truth to the claim.

False claims of mail-in ballots being dumped or shredded

Mail-in ballots and related materials being tossed was another popular falsehood that election officials said they were hearing. We looked at one of these rumours, which was pushed by a far-right website called The Right Scoop. 

This month, the site published an article with the headline, “Tons of Trump mail-in ballot applications SHREDDED in back of tractor trailer headed for Pennsylvania.”

The article generated 163 individual public posts on Facebook. It was liked, commented on and shared 91,000 times on the social network, according to our analysis. It was also shared 1,032 times on Twitter.

PolitiFact debunked the video on which the article was based. Facebook added a label to posts that shared the rumor saying it contained false information.

The Right Scoop later corrected its post – but its correction did not travel as far as the lie, receiving just a single like on Facebook. The Right Scoop did not respond to a request for comment.

False claims of planned violence at polling sites by antifa and Black Lives Matter protesters

Election officials also said people were confronting them with false assertions that antifa, the loose collection of left-wing activists, and Black Lives Matter protesters were coordinating riots at polling places across the country.

One of those rumors began this month when The Federalist, a conservative outlet, noticed that a liberal activist website called Shut Down DC said people should protest on the streets if Trump was reelected. Right-wing commentators then attached inflammatory captions to their posts sharing The Federalist’s article. Many said it was evidence of planned far-left violence on Election Day and after, and stated, without proof, that Black Lives Matter was involved.

The false rumour was then shared in 472 public Facebook posts, according to our analysis. It generated 99,336 likes, shares and comments. On Twitter, the rumour was shared at least 400 times.

Craig Sawyer, a right-wing commentator and Marine veteran, shared the rumour on Facebook on 16 October. He said in an email that his post was not a call for violence and that The New York Times should focus on “the key planners and financiers of all the rioting, arson, looting and murder” instead.

The New York Times

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in