Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to hear Trump’s lawsuit to overturn loss
It is the latest in long line of courtroom defeats for outgoing president
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has rejected Donald Trump’s lawsuit to overturn his election loss in the state to Joe Biden.
It is the latest in a string of courtroom defeats for the outgoing president in battleground states he lost to Mr Biden.
Mr Trump had asked the court to throw out 221,000 ballots in Wisconsin’s two biggest Democratic counties amid allegations they were administered incorrectly.
A recount showed that Mr Biden won by 20,700 votes and the claims were earlier rejected by election officials.
Mr Trump wanted the state’s supreme court to take the case directly, arguing there was not enough time for it to make its way through lower courts before presidential electors cast their votes on 14 December.
Lawyers for Governor Tony Evers and the Wisconsin Department of Justice argued that the law required the case to start in lower courts first.
The defeat is striking as the court is controlled by conservative justices.
One conservative member of the bench, Brian Hagedorn, sided with the court’s three more liberal members in refusing the case.
“We do well as a judicial body to abide by time-tested judicial norms, even — and maybe especially — in high-profile cases," he wrote in an opinion.
“Following the law governing challenges to election results is no threat to the rule of law.”
Mr Trump has also filed a federal lawsuit in Wisconsin to challenge absentee voting, arguing it discriminates against “able-bodied voters", and that drop-off ballot boxes were not manned.
"Not content to try to disenfranchise over 200,000 Wisconsinites in state court, the President is now asking a federal court to take Wisconsin’s choice for President away from voters and to give it to politicians," said Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul.
“Democracy doesn’t work that way. No matter how many lawsuits are filed, we’ll keep standing up for Wisconsin voters.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments