Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses Trump allies’ attempt to throw out millions of mail-in ballots

‘Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear’

Oliver O'Connell
New York
Saturday 28 November 2020 20:14 EST
Comments
‘Your election is a sham’: Giuliani tells Pennsylvania as he appears in Gettysburg

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit brought about by Congressman Mike Kelly, and other allies of Donald Trump, attempting to invalidate the state’s mail-in ballots from the 2020 election.

State attorney general Josh Shapiro called the decision “another win for democracy” describing it as an attempt to throw out the votes of 2.5 million Pennsylvanians and halt certification fo the election results.

The court said that the “Petitioners’ failure to file their facial constitutional challenge in a timely manner" was the basis of the decision.

Plaintiffs cited issues with Act 77 and its “universal mail-in ballot provisions” but waived their opportunity to challenge the law before the election.

Justice David Wecht wrote: “It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters. Courts should not decide elections when the will of the voters is clear.”

The court dismissed the case “with prejudice” meaning that it cannot be refiled.

A group of eight Republicans, including Congressman Kelly, brought the cases against the Republican-majority Pennsylvania general assembly, the state's governor Tom Wolf, and the Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, alleging legislation allowing mail-in voting in the state is unconstitutional.  

Act 77 — which allows mail-in voting in the state — was passed with a majority of Republican support in the state's Republican-majority general assembly in 2019.

It passed Pennsylvania's House 138-61, with only one Republican voting no. Every Republican senator voted yes on the legislation.  

Thus far, every legal challenge brought on behalf of Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 election by invalidating legally cast votes has been thrown out of court.  

The lawsuit alleges that in order for the state to expand its mail-in voting allowances, it would have had to amend its constitution, which it did not do. As a result, the lawsuit argues, all mail-in ballots are illegal. 

In a previous court ruling, the state's Supreme Court ruled in favour of mail-in voting.  

Other election-related lawsuits in Pennsylvania have already been tossed out.  

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in