US Army publishes British officer's essay criticising its handling of Iraq
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US Army has published a criticism of its performance in Iraq by a senior British officer. He accuses American forces of making a tricky situation worse with their cultural arrogance, over-reliance on technology, and inability to recognise the special challenges of counter-insurgency warfare.
The essay, published in the Military Review, was written by Brigadier Nigel Aylwin-Foster, who served in Iraq from December 2003 to November 2O04.
In his piece, Brigadier Aylwin-Foster writes of the "enigma" of the US Army, with its "unparalleled sense of patriotism, duty, passion and commitment... and in no way lacking in humanity and compassion." Yet it was weighed down by "bureaucracy, a stiflingly hierarchical outlook, a pre-disposition to offensive operations."
At times, he adds, the Army showed "a cultural sensitivity ... that arguably amounted to institutional racism." Above all, he argues, it had failed to adapt to the demands of counter-insurgency work, where military operations had a vital political dimension.
The article has provoked anger in some quarters of the US military. Col Kevin Benson, commander of the US Army's School of Advanced Military Studies, described Brigadier Aylwin-Foster as "an insufferable British snob" in The Washington Post yesterday.
Brigadier Aylwin-Foster traces some of the US military's difficulties in Iraq to the philosophy of the official Soldier's Creed, which undertakes to "engage and destroy" the enemy. "Not 'defeat', which could permit a number of other politically attuned options," he notes, "but 'destroy'."
This approach made it harder for American troops to understand that in many "unconventional situations" they "have to be soldiers, not warriors".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments