US Army orders court martial for Bradley Manning
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US soldier accused of passing documents to WikiLeaks in the biggest leak of classified information in US history should face a court martial, a senior US army officer has recommended.
Lieutenant Colonel Paul Almanza recommended Bradley Manning should be tried on 22 charges, but the eventual decision will be taken by Major General Michael Linnington, commander of the Military District of Washington.
The charges Manning faces includes aiding the enemy by allegedly giving more than 700,000 secret US documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks. Prosecutors say the site's founder Julian Assange collaborated with Manning.
Defence lawyers say Manning, 24, from Crescent, Oklahoma, was a troubled young soldier and the army should never have sent him to Iraq or given him access to classified material.
In Manning's preliminary hearing in December, prosecutors produced evidence that Manning transferred to WikiLeaks nearly half a million reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables, and video of a 2007 army helicopter attack.
Manning's lawyers countered that the material WikiLeaks published did little or no harm to national security.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments