US agrees to bigger Security Council
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In an unexpected boost to slow-moving negotiations at the United Nations on enlargement of the Security Council, America is droppingits demand that the new body should be limited to 21 seats. The council now has 15members.
The change in stance, which was welcomed yesterday by Britain, was signalled by the American ambassador to the UN, Richard Holbrooke, at a meeting of a working group on Security Council reform. He said that the US was ready for a council with "slightly more" than 21 places.
The council, which is the nexus of power and prestige at the UN, currently consists of five permanent delegations - Britain, the US, France, China and Russia - with the other 10 seats rotated on a two-year basis to non-permanent members. Membership of the body is a jealously guarded privilege.
While enlarging the council has been on the agenda for several years, progress has been snail-like. By insisting that the overall size should be held at 21, the US was in effect blocking any final agreement because it has long been evident that that would not satisfy the wider UN membership. Any changes will have to be approved by two-thirds of the General Assembly.
Mr Holbrooke is evidently hoping also to draw some of the poison from the relationship between the US and the UN. It may also help unblock talks on cutting US contributions to the UN.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments