Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Upskirt' photos banned in Massachusetts

The bill comes days after a court ruled a man who took 'upskirt' shots was not breaking the law

Kashmira Gander
Friday 07 March 2014 16:45 EST
Comments
A subway car crosses the Charles River in Boston. A man was set free in March after he took photos under women's skirts and dresses on the train system.
A subway car crosses the Charles River in Boston. A man was set free in March after he took photos under women's skirts and dresses on the train system. (Darren McCollester/Newsmakers)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A law has passed in the US state of Massachusetts making it illegal to take photos under people's clothing in public without their consent.

The bill signed by Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick on Friday comes two days after the state’s highest court ruled that a man who took so-called “upskirt” shots of female subway passengers in Boston was not guilty of a crime.

The previous law was written in a way that only protected people photographed in dressing rooms and bathrooms, and were nude or partially nude, rather than clothed people in public.

Michael Robertson was arrested in August 2010 after police were alerted that he was using the camera on his mobile phone to capture photos and videos under women’s clothing.

“A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is “partially nude,” no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing,” the court said in its ruling.

To prevent similar cases in the future, lawmakers passed legislation making it illegal to take photographs or videos of the “sexual or other intimate parts” of adults or children in public.

The law, which takes effect immediately, would punish “upskirting” with a maximum penalty of two-and-a-half years in jail and a $5,000 fine.

The maximum penalties would increase to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine if the victim is a child.

“It is sexual harassment. It's an assault on another person whether it's a child or an adult,” Senate President Therese Murray said after the Senate unanimously approved the bill.

“Women and children should be able to go to public places without feeling that they are not protected by the law.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in