Uber driver is an employee, not a contractor, California agency ruled in possible landmark decision
Labor Commission ruled in March, but decision was not known until Uber appealed this week
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.California has ruled that an Uber driver in the state should be classified as an employee instead of an independent contractor in what could be a landmark case for the transportation company and other so-called on-demand companies.
The California Labor Commission made the ruling in March, but it did not become known until Tuesday, when Uber filed on appeal of the decision, according to the New York Times.
If Uber loses its appeal, this case could set precedent that could drastically change the way the company operates. Employee status could mean that Uber would have to add drivers to company payroll, consider vacation and benefits, and pay drivers a steady paycheck.
It would also mean that Uber likely would have to pay additional taxes and insurance premiums.
Uber maintains it is a “logistics company” that uses an app to connect drivers and would-be passengers who engage in a private transaction. Opponents say the company is essentially a transportation fleet with thousands of drivers.
An Uber spokeswoman said the Labor Commission made the opposite decision in 2012 and that the recent decision is non-binding.
Uber treats drivers like contractors in the sense that it does not schedule specific hours for drivers to work or require a minimum number of shifts.
But it acts like an employer by providing drivers with company phones that they must use while driving and deactivating drivers who haven’t worked in 180 days.
”Defendants hold themselves out as nothing more than a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation,” the ruling says, according to the Times. “The reality, however, is that defendants are involved in every aspect of the operation.”
Follow @PaytonGuion on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments