Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Nearly 1,000 migrant children separated from parents since Trump told to end policy at border

Civil rights group demands court to request clarification for reasoning of separations from Trump administration

Chris Riotta
New York
Tuesday 30 July 2019 19:18 EDT
Comments
Trump official Sarah Fabian tries to argue that detained migrant children did not need beds

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The US has separated nearly 1,000 migrant children arriving at the nation’s southern border from their families despite a federal judge demanding Donald Trump’s administration curtail the practice last year, a new report said Tuesday.

At least 911 children were separated from their families between 28 June of 2018 — when US District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered an end to the practice, barring limited circumstances — and 29 June of this year, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in its report published Tuesday.

The report said one out of every five of the migrant children separated from their families were under the age of five.

The government included a variety of reasons why the more than 900 children had been separated, alleging criminal conduct on the part of their parents, as well as gang affiliation, child safety concerns or apparent unfitness to serve as a guardian.

The ACLU requested court-ordered clarification as to how Mr Trump’s administration determines whether to separate families arriving at the nation’s southern border, with many of those migrants attempting to legally seek asylum, the Associated Press reported.

The ACLU has pushed back against the president’s hard-line immigration policies in the past, battling his multiple travel bans against several Muslim-majority countries and vows to build a sprawling border wall.

The report arrived as the civil rights group announced on Tuesday it filed a court motion to fast-track its lawsuit against the president’s border wall, describing Mr Trump’s emergency declaration on the US-Mexico border an “abuse of emergency powers”.

“We’re racing against the clock to prevent and undo the imminent harm [the wall] would create in our communities and on our democracy,” the ACLU said in a tweet.

The ACLU also noted apparent discrepancies in the government’s excuses for separating the 911 children from their families.

For instance, of the 44 separations involving accusations of assault, the ACLU said at least 11 did not include parents being convicted, while another 34 did not include details about the severity of the claims.

At least 678 of the separated children had cases where their parents were accused of criminal conduct, including at least one instance in which a parent was involved in a $5 (£4.11) theft resulting in their separation.

Mr Trump signed an executive order rolling back his policy that began the systematic separation of migrant families arriving at the southern border last year after a swell of nationwide protests. The administration is now working to complete the reunification of the more than 2,700 children separated during the weeks-long period in which his initial policy was implemented.

The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in