Trump vows to end US birthright citizenship in most hardline immigration policy yet
'It was always told to me you need a constitutional amendment. Guess what, you don't,' president says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Donald Trump has announced he plans to terminate the right to citizenship for babies born on US soil to non-citizens.
The US president, who is taking an increasingly hard-line stance on immigration, said the “process” to end birthright citizenship by executive order is underway, and denied such a fundamental change would need the input of congress.
“It was always told to me you need a constitutional amendment,” Mr Trump told Axios on HBC. “Guess what, you don’t.”
“You can definitely do it with an act of congress, but now they’re saying I can do it just with an executive order,” the president continued.
Asked if he had consulted White House lawyers about such a contentious move, Mr Trump said he had and that it was “in the process, and it will happen”.
Defending his stance, Mr Trump falsely claimed the US was the ”only country in the world” that permits birthright citizenship.
More than 30 countries allow unconditional citizenship to babies born within their borders, including most of the Americas.
“A person comes in, has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States for 85 years with all of those benefits. It’s ridiculous, it’s ridiculous and it has to end,” he said.
After Mr Trump’s comments were published, Republican senator Lindsey Graham vowed to introduce legislation in the senate to mirror the proposal. Meanwhile, vice president Mike Pence also claimed the president had the right to invoke such a change. “The Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th amendment, subject to the jurisdiction thereof, applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally,” he said in an interview with Politico.
Earlier this month, Michael Anton, a former Trump administration official, claimed in a Washington Post op-ed it was “absurd” that “simply being born within the geographical limits of the United States automatically confers US citizenship”.
Any move by Mr Trump to end birthright citizenship, however, would not only spark fury among opponents, it will almost certainly spark legal challenges that would force the courts to decide on its constitutionality.
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, US citizenship is granted to any person born on US soil, and ultimately stems from the Fourteenth Amendment of the American constitution.
The 1868 amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Kehrela Hodkinson, US immigration lawyer and founder of Hodkinson Law Group, told The Independent any presidential order over birthright citizenship would face “many constitutional challenges”, including requests for an injunction against implementation, much like what happened with Mr Trump’s initial travel ban on a number of Muslim-majority countries.
“I think he’s bringing the immigration issue to the public in another way,” she said. “Whether he plans to do this or not I can’t tell you. What would happen with a constitutional challenge? I don’t think an executive order trumps the constitution.”
Mark Krikorian, director at think tank the Center for Immigration Studies, said if implemented the presidential order’s legality would eventually be decided by the supreme court, which has swung to the right in recent weeks after the controversial confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh.
Ms Hodkinson said, however, rescinding birthright citizenship was so “extreme”, that ”even with his stacking of the court, I want to believe that they [judges] would be strict constructionists in this particular case, and would say the wording is clear”.
Mr Trump’s announcement comes just a week before the US midterm elections, which Republicans are increasingly trying to cast as a referendum on immigration.
On Monday evening, the president told Fox News asylum seekers who illegally cross into the US from Mexico will be kept in “very nice” tents.
Railing against a migrant caravan heading for America’s southern border, Mr Trump said his administration is going to build tent cities in preparation for what he described as an “invasion” of the country.
The White House has been contacted for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments