Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Transition of power will be smooth, says Cheney

Leonard Doyle
Sunday 09 November 2008 20:00 EST
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When Dick Cheney hands over to his successor, Joe Biden, the new administration is expected to strip away the vast powers the US Vice-Presidency has accumulated in the past eight years. But Mr Cheney's legacy of operating in the shadows, which has so damaged Washington's reputation abroad, may be more difficult to undo.

He was the unseen hand behind what his critics regard as the Bush presidency's greatest calamities, from starting the war in Iraq to promoting "cruel and inhuman methods of interrogation" of detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Human rights organisations accuse him of war crimes for clearing the way for the CIA to use torture techniques banned under international law.

The outgoing administration has left an "immense" weight of expectations on Barrack Obama to restore the reputation of the US around the world, Tony Blair said yesterday. Mr Obama is "somebody who has a genuine vision of how America can play a healing role in the world and has also some real sensitivity to the fact that people want America to do that," said the former prime minister who is now the UN's Middle-East envoy.

But the consequences of the Bush-Cheney administration, which Mr Blair co-operated with so closely, will not be easy to untangle. Mr Cheney also seems confident that much of his handiwork will remain intact, and that even Mr Obama's commitment to shutting down Guantanamo will be difficult to achieve. More than 250 prisoners are held there, in most cases without trial or charges being brought and often after enduring torture. Some are avowed terrorists, but many are unwitting victims of security sweeps.

As he prepares to leave office, Mr Cheney is unhappy about a policy towards Iran over its nuclear-weapons programme that he considers to be appeasement. He has long been gunning for military strikes against Tehran to prevent the regime from becoming a nuclear power. Until his successor has taken over, his opponents fear his capacity to engineer a military confrontation.

Time has probably run out for him to tie the incoming president-elect into a conflict with Iran. But not until the master of Washington intrigue has handed over the keys to his Naval Observatory residence, adjacent to the British embassy, will his opponents rest easy. Speaking at the weekend, Mr Cheney warned that "in the struggle at hand, the stakes remain high". But he said he was confident that "those who hate America are no match for those who love America".

As soon as Mr Bush took over in 2000, Mr Cheney insisted that all the emails of high-level officials be secretly rerouted to his private office, thereby turning himself into a sinister, if invisible, political power. He intervened in decisions long before they arrived on the President's desk and specialised in "reaching down" to officials, unnerving them with personal phone calls to demand action.

Mr Cheney's behind-the-scenes role in guiding policies which compromised civil liberties in the name of fighting terrorism continues. Only last month, new guidelines were rushed through for the FBI that permit agents to use intrusive techniques to collect information on Americans even where there is no evidence of wrongdoing.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in