Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

There was simply no one else like Paul Newman

Barry Norman's View
Saturday 27 September 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Paul Newman was one of the last two greats of his generation. There is only Clint Eastwood left now, I think. He trained in the method style with Lee Strasberg and in the beginning he was criticised for being a mini Marlon Brando. He was a bit younger than Brando, and Brando was the big star. But he moved away from that, and established his own style. He wasn't a second anybody: he was very much Paul Newman.

He is undoubtedly in the top 10 of all-time great movie stars. Whereabouts I don't know, but he was undoubtedly a great star. Unlike many of the great stars, though, Newman was a very, very good actor. He was also extraordinarily good-looking, with eyes a remarkable shade of bright blue, but his looks got in the way of people appreciating his acting ability until much later in his life.

They assumed he was just a pretty boy and didn't take him seriously. That's perhaps one of the reasons why he was nominated for so many Oscars without winning. In fact, he was a bloody good actor.

It may be true that in some of his early films he got by on his looks, but not in the ones that counted. If you watch Somebody Up There Likes Me (1956), you can see there's a very good actor emerging.

I didn't meet him often, but when I did I found him absolutely charming, though more withdrawn than one would have expected. His wife, Joanne Woodward, was much more bubbly than he was. He was hard to interview: he didn't like to give a lot away.

When he was coming up, there wasn't the prurient curiosity in stars' private lives that exists now. I think he was a thoroughly decent man, however. His marriage to Joanne Woodward was, I believe, very happy. He also had these organic foods, and the proceeds all went to charity.

The film everyone's going to remember him for is Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, because that was one of the great Westerns. But I think his best performance was in Cool Hand Luke (1967) – that and The Hustler (1961). The great thing about Newman's acting was that he became the character he was playing. But, at the same time, there were always those Paul Newman qualities. He appeared on the screen and you warmed to him at once. It didn't matter what kind of part he was playing. Even in Road to Perdition (2002) or Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958), when he was playing not very nice guys, as soon as he appeared on the screen you warmed to him – and that was God-given. There was something that exuded from him: personality, charisma, call it what you like. And that is an enormous asset for any movie star.

Barry Norman was speaking to Andrew Johnson

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in