Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The comma may by dying out, says US professor

John McWhorter suggests one of the English language's most frequently used punctuation marks is becoming redundant in the digital age

Antonia Molloy
Monday 10 February 2014 09:44 EST
Comments
Professor John McWhorter said removing commas from most modern US texts would not have an impact on 'clarity'
Professor John McWhorter said removing commas from most modern US texts would not have an impact on 'clarity' (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It is one of the most commonly used elements of the English language – often littered carelessly through reams of text by grammar novices.

But a US academic has suggested that the comma could be abolished as a punctuation mark without causing much of an impact, Slate has reported.

John McWhorter, an associate professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University, argued that as a new generation of internet users and even some authors become increasingly liberal in their use of comma it may now be surplus to requirements.

And he suggested that removing the punctuation mark from most modern US texts would result in “little loss of clarity”.

Professor McWhorter also highlighted the comma’s inconsistency as further proof of its growing redundancy. He cited the Oxford comma, which is an optional punctuation mark used before the word “and” at the end of a list.

“Nobody has any reason for [using the Oxford comma] that is scientifically sensible and logical in the sense that we know how hydrogen and oxygen combine to form water,” he said.

“So these things are just fashions and conventions. They change over time.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in