Elon Musk and Tesla illegally threatened employees, judge rules
Tweet by tech entrepreneur targeting pro-union employees among unlawful instances
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Elon Musk's electric car company Tesla committed a series of violations of the United States’ National Labour Relations Act in 2017 and last year, a has judge ruled.
The electric-car maker illegally threatened and retaliated against employees, according to Amita Baman Tracy, an administrative law judge in California.
A tweet that Mr Musk sent in May 2018, which suggested employees who chose to join a union would give up company-paid stock options, was among the incidents the judge ruled were in violation of the law.
The judge’s order calls for Tesla to offer reinstatement and back-pay to a fired, pro-union employee, and to revoke a warning issued to another union supporter.
The ruling also calls for the company to hold a meeting at its assembly plant in Fremont, California, that Mr Musk must attend.
Either he or an agent with the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) must read a notice to employees informing them that the labour board concluded the company broke the law.
Representatives for Tesla, which had denied wrongdoing, did not immediately comment. The ruling was issued in response to complaints filed by the United Auto Workers union.
The judge’s ruling can be appealed to NLRB members who are presidential appointees based in Washington, a prospect that all sides have suggested is basically inevitable.
“This will be appealed no matter what I decide,” Ms Tracy said at one point during the trial last year in Oakland.
The NLRB is limited in its ability to punish companies found to have violated labour law.
While the agency can require that companies reinstate and pay back-wages to workers that were illegally fired, it can’t assess punitive damages or hold executives personally liable for violations.
Still, the judge’s ruling against Tesla offers grist to UAW supporters in making their case to workers and elected officials in California who have sought to tie electric vehicle subsidies to companies’ workplace practices.
“This entire trial is an infomercial in an effort to place Mr Musk and the company in a negative light,” Mark Ross, a Tesla attorney, said at the start of the proceedings in June 2018.
Bloomberg
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments