Democrats can still defy Donald Trump and retain control of a crucial Supreme Court seat, activists say
The move would use an unlikely and untested procedure – but the election has come to be defined by them
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Democrats should make use of a strange, untested procedure that would let them keep control of the Supreme Court, activists have said.
When Donald Trump takes up the Presidency in January, he will have control over who is appointed to the Supreme Court. That choice will be confirmed by the Senate, which the Republican Party also now controls.
That will mean that together they will be able to fill the slot that was left on the court by Antonin Scalia, who died earlier this year.
Barack Obama has looked to fill that space with Merrick Garland, a progressive judge. But the Republicans have blocked that decision and are instead waiting to fill it with a nominee of their own – one likely to be at the conservative end of the spectrum of Supreme Court judges.
But Democrats may be able to avoid that decision with a very strange quirk of the US system, activists have said.
Blogger David Waldman has suggested that because of the way the Senate will be filled up with new senators, the Democrats will have control of it for just a few minutes on 3 January next year. For just a few minutes, the new Republican senators won’t have been sworn in and so won’t be able to vote down any new laws.
During that very short period of time, Joe Biden could convene the Senate and call for a vote on the new judge.
The plan is both unlikely and unprecedented, and would likely enrage the Republican senators who have blocked the appointment of Mr Garland. But it is one of a range of technical and procedural measures that activists have looked to in the wake of the election – which have also included campaigns to encourage “faithless electors”, who could still stop Donald Trump from becoming President.
Republicans could then respond by using “court packing”, a move that has been contemplated in similar situations in the past. That involves electing more judges – over and above the nine judges that usually sit on it – so that they can then get a majority on the court.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments