Watch: View of Supreme Court as it faces self-imposed deadline on abortion pill
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Watch outside the Supreme Court on Friday 21 April as it is expected to act before a self-imposed deadline on whether access to an abortion pill will stay the same or be restricted.
The justices, who are a 6-3 conservative majority, are considering a lower court's decision to impose restrictions on the availability of mifepristone, which is used in the most common method of ending a pregnancy in the United States.
It comes after a Texas judge suspended approval of the drug earlier in April, claiming that the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) rushed to approve it 23 years ago without properly considering side effects.
Leading health organisations have found that the drug, as well as another abortion pill misoprostol, are safe and effective.
The US department of justice and mifepristone manufacturer Danco Laboratories have called on the Supreme Court to intervene and remove restrictions to the pill while the lower appeals court reviewed the case.
The Supreme Court had originally said it would decide by Wednesday, 19 April, whether restrictions would take effect while the case continues, but an order signed by Justice Samuel Alito on the same day gave the justices two additional days with no explanation.
Click here to sign up for our newsletters.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments