Stephon Clark: Police officers who fatally shot unarmed black man will not be charged
District attorney says officers justified in using deadly force against Clark who was shot at least seven times
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Two US police officers who shot and killed an unarmed black man in his grandmother’s backyard will not face criminal charges, prosecutors say.
Stephon Clark, 22, was shot at least seven times by officers Terrence Mercadal and Jared Robinet last year in Sacramento, California.
The officers had been dispatched to investigate a vandalism complaint. Within 10 minutes of their arrival, after a brief pursuit, Mr Clark was dead.
Mr Clark’s death took on national significance amid continuing tensions over discriminatory policing in black neighbourhoods and excessive use of force by officers.
“Was a crime committed? There’s no question that a human being died,” District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert said on Saturday in Sacramento.
“But when we look at the facts and the law, and we follow our ethical responsibilities, the answer to that question is no. And as a result, we will not charge these officers.”
Ms Schubert said the officers had probable cause to stop and detain Mr Clark. She added that police officers are legally justified in using deadly force “if the officer honestly and reasonably believes” he is in danger of death or injury.
“We must recognise that they are often forced to make split-second decisions,” she said. “We must also recognise that they are under tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving circumstances.”
The officers fired their weapons 20 times within seconds of turning a blind corner. “Both officers believed that he was pointing a gun at them,” Ms Schubert said.
She added that police video showed Mr Clark was “advancing” on the officers.
Mr Clark was later found to be unarmed; his mobile phone was found under his body. The police department released body camera footage within days of the shooting.
Daniel Hahn, the city’s first black police chief, reiterated that the department required training related to race-based discrimination and de-escalation tactics.
During a news conference on Saturday, Mr Clark’s mother, Sequette Clark, expressed outrage at the decision not to prosecute.
She blasted Mr Schubert for delving into details she said were irrelevant to the officers’ conduct, including personal text messages and a toxicology report showing that Mr Clark had alcohol, codeine, marijuana, cocaine and Xanax in his system.
New York Times
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments