Six women file sex bias claim against Wal-Mart
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Six women employees are taking the Wal-Mart supermarket chain to court, claiming widespread sexual discrimination in pay and promotions.
The lawsuit, lodged this week in San Francisco, seeks recognition as a class-action suit to represent an estimated 700,000 present and former employees of the company which would make it the biggest sexual discrimination brought against a private employer in the United States.
Wal-Mart, whose headquarters are in Arkansas, boasts more than 3,000 supermarkets across America and is the country's largest private employer. More than two-thirds of its staff are women, yet only one-third are managers. The lawsuit claims that the company has in effect created two parallel workforces: one predominantly male, managerial and higher paid, the other mainly female and low-paid.
The women say they were denied the chance to advance in the company because they were not informed of openings and not offered training that would have qualified them for promotion, unlike their male counterparts.
A former employee said that she like other women was routinely assigned to "women's areas" (such as the baby-clothes department), and that their requests to be transferred to the DIY section were rejected.
The company has denied that it practises discrimination and promises to mount a "vigorous defence" in court. "We don't have policies and practices in place that promote discrimination of any kind," a spokesman said. He said women held 37 per cent of the 55,000 managerial positions, up to and including company vice-presidential level. It also denied channelling women to particular "dead-end" areas.
Among the claims made in the lawsuit is that the proportion of women in senior positions compares poorly with the proportion in comparable US chains. Wal-Mart says any comparisons could be misleading, because the definition of managerial responsibilities varies from company to company.
Strongly anti-trade union, Wal-Mart has a history of labour disputes including sexual harassment and discrimination suits in recent years.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments