'Serial’ case reopened by judge, allowing Adnan Syed introduce new evidence
Judge says proceedings would be re-opened 'in the interests of justice for all parties'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Adnan Syed, whose murder conviction became the subject of popular long-form radio show “Serial,” will be allowed to introduce new evidence, a Maryland judge has ordered.
Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Martin Welch ordered that Syed’s post-conviction proceedings would be re-opened “in the interests of justice for all parties.”
The new hearing will be limited to just two issues: an alibi witness and the reliability of cell phone tower evidence presented during his 2000 trial. He is serving a life sentence.
“This is obviously great news for Adnan. It brings us one step closer to our ultimate goal of getting him a new trial,” said C. Justin Brown, Syed’s attorney. “What once appeared highly improbable is starting to look more and more probable.”
From the Baltimore Sun:
The Maryland attorney general’s office has argued against Syed’s requests for a new hearing, saying the claims are “meritless.” [In September], Deputy Attorney General Thiru Vignarajah said reopening the proceedings would be “inconsequential theater and not in the interest of justice.”
Now, the court will consider a 2015 affidavit from Syed’s alibi witness, Asia McClain, in which she said she remembered talking with Syed in the library at the time prosecutors said the then-teenager killed his former girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. McClain said she reached out to Syed about helping with his defence, but his former lawyer never contacted her.
Welch said the court may potentially consider McClain’s live testimony and the failure of Syed’s defence lawyer to contact her as a potential alibi.
The court will also take up the reliability of cellphone evidence that helped the state place Syed at one of the scenes of the crime. Welch wrote that the court will also take up Syed’s former attorney’s “alleged failure to cross-examine” the state’s cellphone expert and “potential prosecutorial misconduct during trial.”
In a sworn affidavit submitted last month, former AT&T engineer Abraham Waranowitz said he wasn’t given a disclaimer about the reliability of such data that he considered “critical” and “would have affected my testimony.”
The new hearing hasn’t been scheduled yet.
© Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments