Senate defies Bush with vote to stop torture of US prisoners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.By a 90 to nine vote, the Senate tacked the demand on to to a $440bn (£250bn) Pentagon spending measure, despite a personal lobbying effort by Vice- President Dick Cheney, and a threat by the White House to veto the bill if it still contained the restrictions. The administration maintains that such curbs would harm its ability to fight the "war on terror".
But astonishingly, 46 of the 55 Senate Republicans, led by John McCain, held firm. The Arizona Senator, who spent seven years as a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam, said that many military officers had begged Congress to provide clear guidelines, in contrast to the ambiguous instructions sent out by the Pentagon.
The revolt suggests that Republicans - even strong supporters of the 2003 invasion such as Mr McCain - are now ready as never before to challenge Mr Bush's handling of the Iraq war, now approved by barely 30 per cent of Americans, according to recent polls.
The provision would set uniform standards for interrogation, banning "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of prisoners. It was also backed by General Colin Powell, the former secretary of state, who said it would help deal with "the terrible public diplomacy crisis created by Abu Ghraib". To become law, the Senate military spending bill must be reconciled with a parallel measure in the House, where White House support is stronger. But after almost five years in office, Mr Bush has yet to veto a single spending bill sent to him by Congress.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments