Seattle voters pass judgement on espresso tax to fund education
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Seattle voters will pronounce today on a proposed tax on their beloved espresso coffees, which would raise money for early childhood education programmes threatened by recent budget cuts.
Seattle voters will pronounce today on a proposed tax on their beloved espresso coffees, which would raise money for early childhood education programmes threatened by recent budget cuts.
The unusual proposal to levy 10 cents per cup of espresso, latte or macchiato - but leave ordinary drip-coffee untaxed - has stirred up residents whose liberal political reflexes are equalled only by their passion for coffee. Proponents say the measure is an almost painless way of raising money for a good cause. For the price of a very modest tip, they say, the city can raise up to $7m (£4.37m) a year to give disadvantaged children a boost at the start of their school careers and help to close the so-called achievement gap.
Opponents, meanwhile, say it is bad public policy and risks hurting smaller independent coffee shops already struggling to compete with Starbucks and the other chain behemoths.
It makes no sense, their argument runs, to tax one product to pay for an entirely unrelated public programme. Unlike tobacco or alcohol, coffee is not regarded as a vice and should not be penalised as though it were.
Despite public sympathy for the measure - one early poll put support at more than 70 per cent -- both Seattle's daily papers have come out against, as has the city's popular former mayor Norm Rice. "Well intended, perhaps - but not well thought out and not good policy," was Mr Rice's judgement. "Child care is too important for us to be relying on a tax on espresso drinks to pay for it."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments