Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Did Sean Spicer really hide in the bushes to avoid White House reporters?

Maya Oppenheim
Friday 12 May 2017 06:12 EDT
Comments
The Washington Post first reported on the saga, saying that Mr Spicer 'spent several minutes hidden in the bushes'
The Washington Post first reported on the saga, saying that Mr Spicer 'spent several minutes hidden in the bushes' (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

While the majority of coverage about Donald Trump’s decision to fire FBI director James Comey has been serious, Sean Spicer’s handling of the situation has provided some light-hearted relief.

The White House Press Secretary has been mocked for seeking refuge in the safety of a nearby hedgerow to evade questioning from reporters over Mr Comey’s termination.

The Washington Post first reported on the saga, saying that Mr Spicer “spent several minutes hidden in the bushes” after giving a TV interview on an outside set.

According to the paper, Janet Montesi, an executive assistant in the press office, then emerged and told reporters that Mr Spicer would answer some questions as long as he was not filmed while doing so.

However, it has now emerged that Mr Spicer was not actually hiding "in the bushes" and was instead "among" the bushes.

The publication was forced to issue a correction to the story after a White House official took issue with the exact details of Mr Spicer's whereabouts after he'd retreated to the shrubbery.

The initial story, a colourful descriptive piece, has now been amended to reflect that Mr Spicer was hiding "among" the bushes rather than inside them.

The article now includes a note which reads: “EDITOR'S NOTE: This story has been updated to more precisely describe White House press secretary Sean Spicer's location late Tuesday night in the minutes before he briefed reporters. Spicer huddled with his staff among bushes near television sets on the White House grounds, not "in the bushes," as the story originally stated.”

In this context, the definition of the words "in" and "among" is not massively different. The Cambridge Dictionary defines "Among" as being "in the middle of or surrounded by other things" and gives the example of: "The Rescue teams searched among the wreckage for survivors". On the other hand, they define "in" as being "inside a container, place, or area, or surrounded or closed off by something", and give the example of "I got stuck in a traffic jam for half an hour".

The correction garnered ridicule and amusement on Twitter, with New York Magazine branding it as "one of the great newspaper corrections of the Trump era".

Melissa McCarthy will reprise her role as Sean Spicer on Saturday Night Live this week and it is expected to include a reference to the bushes furore.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in