Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Saudi Arabia had nothing to do with 9/11 attacks, claim the country’s lawyers

A court battle is taking place over alleged involvement by the Kingdom

Jon Stone
Wednesday 15 April 2015 03:47 EDT
Comments
New York’s 110-storey World Trade Center
New York’s 110-storey World Trade Center (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lawyers acting on behalf of Saudi Arabia have strongly denied allegations that the country had anything to do with the financing of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Papers were filed at a US court by the lawyers say there is no evidence that Saudi Arabia supported or caused the 9/11 attacks and urge a judge to dismiss claims stemming from a 2002 lawsuit against the Kingdom.

Saudi Arabia was amongst a number of organisations taken to court in 2002 after the attacks but the case against the country’s government was thrown out on the grounds of sovereign immunity.

A Federal appeals court however in 2013 reinstated the case against the regime – arguing that the extraordinary circumstances meant there was a legal exception.

The lawyers defending the country’s government wrote: “If they had a single piece of evidence that would stand up in court, they would highlight it in their papers.

“Instead, they focus heavily on witnesses manifestly lacking personal knowledge, and on newspaper articles, blog posts, and similar multiple hearsay. They thus reveal that they have nothing better.”

Saudi Arabia is an autocracy ruled by a hereditary monarch. The country is routinely criticised for alleged human rights violations, especially on the grounds on gender inequality.

The papers were filed the day after reports in the US newspaper The New York Post claimed that the FBI had ‘covered up’ an investigation into the Saudi elite’s alleged involvement.

Former Democratic Senator Bob Graham, who chaired the congressional inquiry into 9/11, told the New York Post yesterday that he believed the FBI was covering up Saudi links to the outrage.

The final 28 pages of his report are classified, and he wants the US president to make them public.

“The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier,” he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in