Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Why parents of Sandy Hook victims are suing Alex Jones

Online video shows talk show host citing various arguments to prove massacre was fake

Abby Ohlheiser
Thursday 19 April 2018 09:29 EDT
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones addresses his thoughts on Sandy Hook shooting being a hoax

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

These days, violent events like mass shootings become breeding grounds for conspiracy theories. Recent lawsuits are trying to change that, by targeting one of the main reasons for this trend - Alex Jones.

Three parents who lost children in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting sued Mr Jones for defamation earlier this week. Mr Jones once said that Sandy Hook was “completely fake with actors” and his voice has grown louder since.

His main YouTube channel now has 2.3 million subscribers, double what it was three years ago. Part of that growth comes from his connection to Donald Trump, who has previously praised what he believes is Mr Jones’s “amazing” reputation.

Two other lawsuits, from targets of other conspiracy theories amplified by Mr Jones, were filed over the past month.

“It is clearly a moment where people are saying ‘enough is enough,’” said Danielle Citron, a law professor at the University of Maryland who specialises in online privacy, in an interview last month.

These suits are part of a growing trend: a woman in Montana teamed up with the Southern Poverty Law Centre to sue the neo-Nazi who ran the Daily Stormer website, saying it was harassing her.

Still, such cases are relatively untested legal territory. And Ms Citron said that “bringing these sorts of lawsuits ... comes with risk” of further harassment. But increasingly, that’s a risk the victims of conspiracy theories are taking.

Here is a breakdown of the three groups that have cases against Mr Jones:

The Sandy Hook parents

Three parents who lost children in the Sandy Hook shootings are suing Mr Jones for defamation in two separate lawsuits, filed by the same Texas-based attorneys. The complaints say that Mr Jones and other Infowars hosts were part of a “continuation and elaboration of a years-long campaign to falsely attack the honesty of the Sandy Hook parents, casting them as participants in a ghastly conspiracy and cover-up”.

Neil Heslin lost his son Jesse Lewis, six, in the Sandy Hook shooting. Mr Heslin is suing Mr Jones and Infowars host Owen Shroyer.

In 2017, Megyn Kelly interviewed some of the victims of Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists, as part of a story on Mr Jones Mr Jones. Mr Heslin spoke about his experience of the shooting’s aftermath: “I lost my son. I buried my son. I held my son with a bullet hole through his head,” he said.

Mr Shroyer responded to Heslin in a video a few days later by claiming it was “not possible” for Mr Heslin to have held his son. According to the complaint, Mr Shroyer’s claim was based on incomplete information about how the medical examiner’s office processed and identified the bodies of the victims after the shooting.

Mr Jones re-aired Mr Shroyer’s disproven accusation days later, saying, “quite frankly, the father needs to clarify, NBC needs to clarify”. In that same segment, Mr Jones said “you can’t blame people for asking” whether Sandy Hook was a hoax or not.

The other parents suing Mr Jones are Leonard Pozner and Veronique De La Rosa, who lost their son Noah Pozner in the mass shooting. Mr Pozner has become one of the more visible victims of attacks from Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists, after he and his family were intensely targeted for harassment. In July of last year, a Sandy Hook conspiracy believer was sent to prison for threatening Mr Pozner.

The suit primarily has to do with a video from April of last year titled: Sandy Hook Vampires Exposed, in which Mr Jones commented on a CNN interview between Ms De La Rosa and Anderson Cooper.

Watching the video, Mr Jones said: “So here are these holier than thou people, when we question CNN, who is supposedly at the site of Sandy Hook and they got in one shot leaves blowing and the flowers that are around it and you see the leaves blowing and they go [gestures]. They glitch. They’re recycling a green-screen behind them.”

In the one-hour video, which is still available on YouTube, Mr Jones walked through several other points that conspiracy theorists cite as proof the shooting was faked. For instance, “they had porta potties being delivered an hour after it happened, for the big media event”.

Each suit, filed in Travis County District Court in Texas (where Mr Jones and Infowars is based), asks for more than $0.70m in damages.

Mr Jones and Mr Shroyer have not yet commented on the lawsuits. Mr Jones now says he believes children died at Sandy Hook, but still says he still believes there are “anomalies”.

The man who filmed the deadly Charlottesville protests

Brennan Gilmore was in Charlottesville, Virginia, on 12 August 2017, when a car ploughed through a group of counter protesters who opposed a white nationalist rally.

His camera captured the car as it approached the group and then as it sped, backwards, away from the scene.

It was the deadly incident that left 32-year-old Heather Heyer dead. James Fields, who has identified himself as a neo-Nazi, now faces a first degree murder charge.

Mr Gilmore tweeted the video and it went viral.

When The Washington Post spoke with Mr Gilmore and his attorney Andrew Mendrala in March, he was still getting threats related to the conspiracy theory that developed around him, falsely accusing him of being a CIA operative who helped to stage the attack.

Mr Gilmore is suing Mr Jones and other right-wing Internet personalities for defamation.

Mr Jones said in one video that Mr Gilmore “worked for John Podesta”. His YouTube channel showed videos of Mr Gilmore on the news, as Mr Jones accused him of being a “state department insider with a long history of involvement in psy-ops.” A 20 August Infowars video about Mr Gilmore has more than 30,000 views on YouTube.

As a result of these conspiracy theories, “Gilmore was physically accosted on the street in Charlottesville by an unknown person,” the complaint said. In another incident, Mr Gilmore received a letter at his parents’ address with a suspicious powdery residue and a letter explaining why Mr Gilmore would “burn in hell”.

Mr Gilmore and his attorneys at the Georgetown Law Civil Rights Clinic are specifically seeking a jury trial in a federal court in Virginia in order to “set a precedent".

The hope is that their case will “blunt their ability to do to others what they did to me,” Mr Gilmore said.

Falsely accused Parkland shooter

If you spent any time on the conspiracy fringes the hours after the Parkland school shooting, you might have seen Marcel Fontaine’s photograph. He’s wearing a red shirt with a hammer and sickle, his fist raised in the air. There are several figures on the shirt: Lenin, and Stalin, for instance. They’re holding red solo cups, as if they are at a party.

Tweets falsely saying the photo depicted Nicholas Cruz got thousands of retweets on social media. As Snopes noted, 4chan had first posted and mocked Mr Fontaine’s photo a few days before the shooting.

As the photo spread, the conspiracy internet picked it up as an authentic image of the shooter, citing it as proof of his political leanings. Infowars used the headline “Reported Florida Shooter Dressed as Communist, Supported Isis”. That article now has a “retraction, clarification and correction” at the top of the story.

Although the image was only on Infowars for a few hours, the lawsuit says Mr Fontaine still faces “ridicule, harassment, and threats of violence” from those who believe it is authentic and that he is part of a “false flag” operation.

The suit was filed earlier this month in Travis County District Court in Texas, by the same team of attorneys representing the Sandy Hook parents.

Infowars did not return a request for comment on these lawsuits.

The Washington Post

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in