Covington student Nick Sandmann loses defamation case against media outlets over confrontation with Native American activist
Viral video showed Nathan Phillips sang a traditional song and beat a drum as Nick Sandmann stood and smiled at him
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge has dismissed five defamation lawsuits brought against national media companies by a Kentucky student over a highly publicised 2019 incident at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC.
Nick Sandmann, then a 16-year-old student at Covington Catholic High School, appeared in a viral video that showed him standing face-to-face with a Native American activist.
That man, Vietnam veteran Nathan Phillips, sang a traditional song and beat a drum as Mr Sandmann, wearing a red MAGA hat, stood and smiled at him.
His lawsuits against The New York Times, CBS, ABC, Gannett Co Inc, and Rolling Stone had been filed in federal court in Kentucky, while he had already settled cases against three other media companies, including CNN and NBC News.
His lawsuit was based on statements published by the media outlets in which Mr Phillips alleged Mr Sandmann had “blocked” him or “wouldn’t allow” him to leave as the pair faced each other at the Washington DC monument.
Mr Sandmann stated in court papers that the claims were false and defamatory and that they had been published by the media companies with malicious intent.
But that argument was rejected by US District Judge William Bertelsman, who ruled that the claims were “objectively unverifiable and thus unactionable opinions”.
“Instead, a reasonable reader would understand that Phillips was simply conveying his view of the situation,” Judge Bertelsman stated.
“And because the reader knew from the articles that this encounter occurred at the foot of the Lincoln Memorial, he or she would know that the confrontation occurred in the expansive area such that it would be difficult to know what might constitute ‘blocking’ another person in that setting.”
The judge added that the media pendants in the case “were covering a matter of great public interest, and they reported Phillips’s first-person view of what he experienced. This would put the reader on notice that Phillips was simply giving his perspective on the incident.”
Mr Sandmann’s lawyer, Todd McNurty told The Lexington Herald-Leader they were “disappointed” at the decision and intend to appeal it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments