US sailors made ‘rape list’ of female colleagues, investigation finds
Lists ranked women using star system with ‘lewd and sexist comments’ beside each name, according to 74-page investigative report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sailors aboard a US Navy submarine circulated sexually explicit lists that ranked female crew members, an investigation has found.
The lists, first reported on Friday by Military.com, were uncovered through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The 74-page investigative report reveals two lists – one with Yelp-like star ratings on the women and another containing “lewd and sexist comments” beside each woman's name, according to Military.com.
In February 2018, the guided-missile submarine USS Florida became the second to integrate female members.
The misconduct came to light four months later, when two sailors aboard the Florida brought the lists to a superior officer, reporting that they were stored on an internal computer network and updated regularly, Military.com reported.
At the time, the submarine employed 32 women in its 173-person crew.
The lists – which Military.com characterises as “rape lists” – were described as ranking “females by appearances, characteristics and various sexual acts the creators of the list wish to perform with them,” including “aggressive sexual activity”.
The lists do “not reference non-consensual acts”, the report said, noting that a search of submarine networks by commanding officer Captain Gregory Kercher and a forensic test by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service did not locate either list.
The officers reported the existence of the lists in early June, the outlet reported. By the time the complaint reached Mr Kercher, the investigation alleged, the sexual-assault-prevention point person, an equal-opportunity manager and Mr Kercher's higher-up adviser had already been notified about the lists.
Mr Kercher, who did not respond to The Washington Post's request for comment, did not open a formal investigation or discuss the allegations with his command, according to Military.com. Instead, he purportedly addressed the problem by identifying crew members who were accessing and sharing the lists.
By means that are unclear, Navy officials above Mr Kercher found out about the lists and conducted a formal investigation while the submarine was in the Indian Ocean. The date the investigation began is unknown.
The investigation concluded that “trust up and down the chain of command was nonexistent”.
With rumours swirling, relations among shipmates deteriorated. One woman told Military.com she began to “question all males on the boat.” Another said she felt compelled to send photos of the lists to family members at home; she worried the chain of command would “sweep it under the rug.”
Rear Admiral Jeff Jablon, then-commander of Submarine Group 10, wrote in a letter obtained by Military.com that few crew members knew what, if any, action had been taken by their superiors.
“Significant numbers of females became concerned for their safety,” he wrote, “and male members who learned of the list were equally repulsed,” the outlet reports.
As a result of the investigation, Mr Kercher was fired; he had held the position for five months, a tenure during which there were also complaints of high workloads. Mr Jablon said Mr Kercher fell “far short of expected standards and norms for an event of this magnitude”.
Two sailors were discharged, and “additional administrative actions were taken” against several others who mishandled the incident, US submarine services spokeswoman Sarah Self-Kyler told Military.com. The investigation also concluded that the equal-opportunity reporting process was ineffective.
In a statement, Admiral Chas Richard, commander of US Submarine Forces, said: “While I cannot guarantee that an incident such as this will never happen again, I can guarantee that we will continue to enforce our high standards of conduct and character in the force. ”
He added that that anyone who falls short of those expectations would be held accountable.
Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments