Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rumsfeld must go, says US Army newspaper

Simon Usborne
Sunday 05 November 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In a fresh blow to the Republican Party's rapidly diminishing midterm election hopes, an influential US Army newspaper group is today calling on the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, to resign for the "failure" of his military strategy.

The blunt message, published in the Military Times newspapers, which include the widely read Army Times, accuses Mr Rumsfeld of losing touch with military leadership and the American public.

The editorial, "Time for Rumsfeld to Go",says: "Rumsfeld has lost credibility with the uniformed leadership, with the troops, with Congress and with the public. His strategy has failed, and his ability to lead is compromised." It concludes: "The time has come, Mr President, to face the hard bruising truth; Donald Rumsfeld must go."

The call could not come at a worse time for President George Bush or the Republicans. Tomorrow's elections are widely tipped to be a disaster for the party, with some predicting a Democrat recapture of both houses of Congress. The New York Times offered a fresh blow to the party yesterday saying that for the first time it was endorsing no Republican congressional candidates this year. In its editorial, the Times criticised the Republican-led Congress on matters from tax cuts to energy policy, and charged it has failed to hold Mr Bush accountable for the Iraq war.

The conflict in Iraq, where there has been a sharp increase in violence in recent months and the death toll of US soldiers is spiralling upwards, has become a political liability for Mr Bush and Mr Rumsfeld.

Mr Bush commended his Defence Secretary last week for doing "a good job", but several conservatives who supported the invasion are publicly criticising the administration's handling of the conflict. Richard Perle, a former defence adviser to Mr Bush, told Vanity Fair magazine that incompetence had turned Iraq policy into a "disaster".

Kenneth Adelman, another neo-con who served on the Defence Policy Board, predicted that the invasion would be a "cakewalk". But he now judges Mr Bush's national security team to be incompetent. "Not only did each of them individually have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional," he said.

Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, has dismissed the Military Times editorial as a "shabby piece of work". And Bryan Whitman, the spokesman for the Pentagon, said criticism from military leaders cited in the editorial was "actually old news".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in