Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tuna with small levels of radioactivity from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan have been caught off the shores of Oregon and Washington states.
But experts say there’s no need to panic – you’d have to eat more than 700,000 pounds of the fish with the highest level of radioactivity to match the amount of radiation the average human is exposed to everyday.
In fact, the figure is a mere 0.1 per cent of the level set by America’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The study, penned by researchers from Oregon State University, says the findings are remarkable because they shed light on the extent of the Fukushima meltdown on the Pacific Ocean in March 2011.
Researchers carried out tests on 26 albacore tuna fish caught prior to the 2011 power plant disaster and those caught after.
At their worst, they found radiation levels tripled from fish tested before Fuskushima and fish tested in the years since.
They chose the fish because it is known for migrating across the Pacific Ocean between Japan and America.
Delvan Neville, a researcher with the OSU, said: “The levels were way too small to really be a food safety issue, but we still want to tell people about it so they know what’s there.”
He added that thanks to continued support from the Oregon Sea Grant, the research will be expanded to examine specimens caught fish from California and other parts of the North Pacific.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments