Quebec to vote on law forcing Muslim women to remove face veils on public transport
Ban would apply to anyone providing or receiving public service in Canadian province
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Muslim women who wear a burka or niqab in the Canadian province of Quebec, could soon be forced to remove them when using public transport.
A new law proposed by the local government would ban any form of face covering for people offering and receiving public services in the province.
Bill 62 could be put to a vote in Quebec’s National Assembly this week and if passed, it would ban public workers including doctors, nurses, teachers and bus drivers from wearing face veils.
"As long as the service is being rendered, the face should be uncovered," the province's justice minister Stéphanie Vallée told the Daybreak TV show. "This is a bill about le vivre ensemble (living together in harmony). It's a bill about guidelines and clearly establishes neutrality of the state."
She said the ban was needed for “communication reasons, identification reasons and security reasons”.
The law, which would be the first of its kind in North America, has received criticism over both the vagueness of its implementation, and its perceived targeting of Muslim women.
Under the legislation, an exemption is possible if someone has a “serious” request to continue wearing a face covering on religious grounds.
Critics say it is not clear how “serious” will be interpreted and how exemptions would work in reality.
Jagmeet Singh, leader of Canada’s New Democratic Party, told the Huffington Post in August that Bill 62 “contravenes individuals freedoms” and would “disproportionately impact Muslims”.
“I think it is important to acknowledge that the Muslim community is facing a very significant amount of hate and Islamophobia, and it is up to all of us to stand in solidarity with the community,” he said.
Responding to claims the law will not target religious symbols, as it would also apply to people wearing masks, a Canadian Council of Muslim Women board member said: “For me, neutrality would be everyone believes what they want to.”
"Forcing someone to uncover, or forcing someone to cover: for me that's not neutrality," she said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments