Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kremlin labels US intelligence report into election hacking claims an 'amateurish, unprofessional witch-hunt'

No new evidence of Russian involvement, Moscow says

Maria Tsvetkova,Christian Lowe
Monday 09 January 2017 11:44 EST
Comments
Vladimir Putin at his annual press conference in Moscow last month. The Kremlin has dismissed the report on the alleged Russian operation
Vladimir Putin at his annual press conference in Moscow last month. The Kremlin has dismissed the report on the alleged Russian operation (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Allegations that Russia tried to influence the US election in favour of Donald Trump amount to a witch-hunt, the Kremlin has said, in its first reaction to the release of a US intelligence report on the alleged Russian operation.

The report, a redacted version of which was released publicly last week, alleged that Russian President Vladimir Putin directed a cyber campaign aimed at helping Mr Trump beat his rival Hillary Clinton in the race for the White House.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said no new evidence had been produced to show that Russian officials was involved.

“We are observing a serious fatigue with these accusations,” Mr Peskov told reporters on a conference call. “It truly is reminiscent of a witch-hunt.”

His words echoed a phrase used by Mr Trump himself, who was quoted as saying in an interview with The New York Times newspaper on Friday that the storm over Russian hacking was a “political witch-hunt”.

Mr Peskov, commenting on the US intelligence report, said: “You know, that version of the report that was made public added no substance whatsoever that we can comment on.”

“Groundless accusations which are not supported by anything are being rehearsed in an amateurish, unprofessional way. We don't know what information they are actually relying on.”

Asked if Mr Putin himself had read a translation of the report, Mr Peskov said there was nothing in the document “that's worth reading in detail”.

But Mr Peskov said the Kremlin's position, as in the past, was that it categorically ruled out that any Russian official could have been involved in hacking related to the 2016 US presidential election.

Both Mr Trump and Mr Putin have said they want to restore US-Russian relations, and the Kremlin spokesman indicated that Moscow was looking beyond the hacking row and ahead to the new administration.

Mr Peskov said there had been witch-hunts in the past in US history, but those periods came to an end when what he described as more sober leaders took charge.

Mr Peskov said that once Mr Trump had been inaugurated on 20 January, work would begin on finding a date for a first meeting between the Russian and US leaders.

“If some kind of contacts will be planned, then they will be planned extremely painstakingly, carefully, especially since we are talking about contacts following a very tense period in our relations,” he said, referring to disputes between the Kremlin and the Obama administration.

Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in