Pro-war Lieberman in desperate bid for votes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The war in Iraq could become the key issue for Democratic candidates seeking the presidency in 2008, experts predicted yesterday, as a long-time supporter of the occupation was fighting for his political life.
Senator Joe Lieberman, the Democrats' most senior and outspoken supporter of President George Bush's Iraq policy, was involved in a down-to-the wire contest in his home state of Connecticut against the Democratic challenger Ned Lamont. Voters went to the ballots yesterday with polls giving Mr Lamont, a cable television entrepreneur and political newcomer, a six-point advantage over Mr Lieberman, though the gap was narrowing.
Mr Lieberman, a three-time incumbent and former Democratic vice-presidential candidate, has been campaigning furiously and has cut Mr Lamont's lead by seven points in recent days. Some commentators believe Mr Lieberman might do enough to secure the primary, opening the way for him to again be his party's candidate in November's congressional contest.
But whether Mr Lieberman wins or loses, experts said party activists had delivered the clearest of messages to candidates that they were opposed to the war and were opposed to offering any support for Mr Bush's policy in Iraq.
Larry Sabato, professor of politics at the University of Virginia, said: "If he loses, clearly the message sent by activists in the blue states is that Iraq will be a fundamental divide in the primaries of 2008 ... If he wins I'm not sure the message is that different."
Senator Hillary Clinton, who is likely to be a front-runner, last week called for the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, to resign - a move seemingly at odds with the hawkish comments she has been making about Iraq over the past 18 months.
"The other [candidates] will find some way to get the message out that they are opposed to Iraq," Mr Sabato added.
Mr Lieberman made a series of appearances across the state to appeal to voters as they went to the polls. He told the Associated Press that voters who were upset with him were "trying to send me a message". He added: "I got their message. I think they want to send me back to Washington to continue working with them, fighting for them, and delivering for Connecticut."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments