Polls show Dean surging ahead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Presidential candidate Howard Dean, former governor of Vermont, is leading his nearest Democratic challenger by 13 points in the crucial state of New Hampshire.
A new poll suggests that, despite the entrance into the race of General Wesley Clark, and concerted attacks by his rivals, Mr Dean has managed to keep a two-digit gap between himself and John Kerry, Senator for Massachusetts.
In a poll for The Boston Globe released on Sunday, Mr Dean received the support of 37 per cent of those questioned in New Hampshire, while Mr Kerry had the backing of 24 per cent. A month ago Mr Dean had a 12-point advantage in the state, which holds its primary election on 27 January.
On Sunday night, the field of Democratic candidates mounted fresh attacks against President George Bush - and each other - during the latest televised debate.
Mr Kerry, who has attracted widespread criticism because of his apparently ambiguous position on Iraq, tried to explain his decision to back Mr Bush's initial request for the use of military force as well as his current position, opposing a request for $87bn (£51bn) to pay for the costs of occupation.
General Clark, a former Nato supreme commander, faced questions on whether he would have voted to support the war and the $87bn request for Congressional funding. "President Bush said he was going to get Osama bin Laden, dead or alive. Instead, he went after Saddam Hussein. He doesn't have eitherone of them today," he told the audience in Detroit.
With just 12 weeks to the first electoral showdown - in Iowa and then in New Hampshire - the candidates are increasing the level of attacks on each other. Observers say this is likely to remain the strategy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments