Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook bleak for Spector as murder trial goes to jury

Andrew Gumbel
Thursday 06 September 2007 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Four and a half years after a struggling actress ended up dead in the foyer of his fake Pyrenean chateau in the Los Angeles suburbs, Phil Spector is about to find out if the benevolent laws of celebrity justice apply to him – as they did to O J Simpson and Michael Jackson – or if he will spend the next several years behind bars as a convicted killer.

The legendary record producer's five-month-long murder trial – the first to be televised since the O J circus more than a decade ago – is expected to go to the jury tomorrow, and the consensus among lawyers and journalists is that Spector's prospects are not too good.

Just about everything that could have gone wrong for his defence team has. Spector's lead attorney, Bruce Cutler, rubbed up the judge and jury the wrong way several times, then vanished for weeks to appear in a reality TV show, then quit on the final day of witness testimony because his client did not want him to deliver the closing statement.

The defence's star expert forensic witness – a veteran of the O J case called Henry Lee – was accused by the judge of failing to turn over evidence he picked up from the crime scene and then lying about it. He ended up not testifying.

The prosecution has been led by a masterful deputy district attorney, Alan Jackson, who accused his adversaries of mounting no more than a "chequebook defence", in which expert witnesses were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to come up with sympathetic interpretations of the facts.

Lana Clarkson was a struggling actress and performer when she ran into Spector at the House of Blues nightclub in West Hollywood, where she was working as a hostess, on the night of 3 February 2003. Clarkson accepted an invitation to ride back to Spector's house in a chauffeur-driven limousine only to wind up with a bullet in her head from a.38 Colt Cobra.

The prosecution team contended that Spector had a long history of threatening women with firearms, calling four powerful witnesses who told harrowing stories of what it was like to date the man who invented the "Wall of Sound". It also called Spector's driver, Adriano de Souza, who recalled Spector coming out of his house right after the shooting and saying: "I think I killed somebody."

The defence sought to argue that Clarkson shot herself, either accidentally or because she was suicidal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in