Woman awarded $1m after gas station worker told her: ‘I don’t serve Black people’
Rose Wakefield, 63, was refused service in 2020 by Oregon attendant who told her: ‘I don’t serve Black people’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A 63-year-old woman awarded $1 million by an Oregon jury after a gas station attendant refused her service because she was Black feels “vindicated,” her lawyer said on Saturday.
Rose Wakefield, of Portland, sued Jacksons Food Stores after stopping at one of the company’s locations in March 2020 in Beaverton, where she continued to wait for service while an attendant pumped gas for white customers who’d arrived after her. (Oregon and New Jersey are the only two states in which it is illegal in most areas for drivers to pump their own gas.)
After complaining and being helped by another attendant, she asked the first person why she’d had to wait and was told “I don’t serve Black people,” according to the lawsuit.
Greg Kafoury represented Ms Wakefield during the four-day civil trial last week in Multnomah County and spoke on Saturday with The New York Times after a jury awarded his client $1m, including $550,000 in punitive damages
“This company deserved to be publicly humiliated just as they had publicly humiliated my client by calling her a liar in court for four days when she had been telling the truth,” he said.
“I went to a gas station to get gas and service, and I wasn’t served. I was actually humiliated and disrespected,” Ms Wakefield told KGW, adding: “I was like, ‘What world am I living in?’
“This is not supposed to go down like that. It was a terrible, terrible confrontation between me and this guy.”
Cory Jackson, the president of Jacksons Food Stores, said in an email to the Times that there was a “zero-tolerance” policy against discrimination and said the company disagreed with the verdict.
“After carefully reviewing all facts and evidence, including video surveillance, we chose to take this matter to trial because we were comfortable based on our knowledge that the service-related concern actually reported by the customer was investigated and promptly addressed,” Mr Jackson said. “As such, we respectfully disagree with the jury’s ruling because our knowledge does not align with the verdict.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments