Obama threatens military intervention in Libya
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.US president Barack Obama said yesterday that the United States and its Nato allies are considering military intervention in Libya in the strongest warning yet to Colonel Muammar Gaddafi that the world will not stand by as the embattled Libyan leader attacks his own people.
Mr Obama said the US would support the Libyan people against "unacceptable" violence after pro-regime forces deployed jets, helicopters and artillery against civilians in an effort to retake western cities near Tripoli that had fallen to the opposition.
"I want to send a very clear message to those who are around Colonel Gaddafi. It is their choice to make how they operate moving forward. And they will be held accountable for whatever violence continues to take place," Mr Obama said.
His remarks will probably be met with mixed reactions from the Libyan opposition, which has back-pedalled on its appeals for Western intervention.
Yesterday evening the foreign ministers of Gulf states called on the UN to impose a no-fly zone. But earlier in the day, Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen downplayed the prospect of military intervention in the oil-rich nation, saying the alliance had "no intention to intervene" without a UN mandate, but added that he could not imagine the world would "stand idly by" if Colonel Gaddafi continued to attack civilians.
Al Jazeera TV reported that Colonel Gaddafi had offered negotiations that could lead to him stepping down, a move that was apparently rejected by the opposition. He was said to have asked for guarantees of safety for him and his family and a pledge that he would not face trial, but the opposition rejected as it would represent an honourable exit for the dictator.
The West has watched as Colonel Gaddafi unleashed lethal force against his people, and in recent days, his forces have mounted ruthless counter-offensives to claim Az Zawiya and Misurata, rebel-held cities close to Tripoli, while Libyan jets have launched air strikes on rebels on the eastern front.
Should Washington seek to intervene militarily, it will have to overcome Russian and Chinese opposition to secure a mandate from the UN Security Council. Moscow yesterday said the Libyans "have to solve their problems by themselves". Britain and France are said to be drafting a resolution on a no-fly zone, which could be put to the UN Security Council later this week, an unnamed UN envoy said.
It is not clear if even a limited foreign involvement is desired by the Libyan opposition National Council (NC), formed two days ago, despite earlier appeals for air strikes on regime strongholds. Opposition officials suggested that rebel fighters could view foreign intervention in a negative light. "There was a clear call but our perception is that the West is not ready for it," said Iman Bugaighis, NC spokeswoman.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments