'Newsweek' tightens use of sources
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A chastened Newsweek has announced that it will scrutinise anonymous sources more strictly to prevent a repeat of the magazine's mistaken story about alleged desecration of the Koran at Guantanamo Bay.
In a letter to readers, Richard Smith, Newsweek's chairman and editor-in-chief, formally apologised for the Koran report, which the magazine had retracted, and promised to raise the magazine's standards for anonymous sourcing.
"We got an important story wrong," Mr Smith admitted. "We must redouble our efforts to make sure that nothing like this ever happens again." Two senior editors will have to approve the use of such unidentified sources for articles, while Newsweek will stop using the phrase "sources said", the attribution of the item in the magazine's "Periscope" section in the 9 May issue.
The report drew complaints from the White House and was blamed for riots in Afghanistan.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments