New York mayor Mike Bloomberg sees ban on sugary drinks overturned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A state judge dramatically halted New York City's ban on large sugary drinks yesterday just hours before it was due to go into effect, calling it "arbitrary and capricious".
The ruling shocked the mayor of New York, Mike Bloomberg, who vowed to appeal, insisting the decision had been made "totally in error".
Mr Bloomberg, who has made public health a cornerstone of his time in office, vowed to appeal. But it is unclear if the case will be resolved by the time his term expires at the end of this year. "Anytime you adopt a groundbreaking policy, special interests will sue," he said. "That's America."
In his ruling, New York supreme court judge Milton Tingling said the regulations, which would have banned the sale of sugary drinks larger than 16oz, were "fraught with arbitrary and capricious consequences".
In a 37-page ruling, he said New York is "enjoined and permanently restrained" from implementing or enforcing the new regulations.
The proposed law banned the sale of containers larger than 16oz of sugary drinks at restaurants and cinemas. It would have started today, with $200 fines for offending businesses taking effect in June.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments