Manhattan couple haven't paid rent for six years due to legal loophole
The building does not have a residential certificate so they should not have to pay, they argue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A couple living in one of New York’s most expensive neighbourhoods havs refused to pay rent for more than six years claiming that a loophole in the law makes them exempt.
Zachary Bennett and Karen Nourse have lived for free with their two children in a $4,754-a-month (£3,908) flat in Chelsea, Manhattan.
The family claim that since the building does not have a residential certificate of occupancy, they should not have to pay.
But their landlord has claimed the couple now owe $410,000 (£337,000) in unpaid rent and electricity bills, according to a law suit.
While other households were living in the nine-story building when they first moved in, the other floors are now occupied with businesses.
Under little known legislation known as "Loft Law", people living in illegal commercial and factory buildings are afforded protections.
The legislation – which was expanded in 2010 – was as designed to improve fire safety protections and prevents the family from having to pay, their lawyer said.
“This building does not comply with the Loft Law,” their lawyer, Margaret Sandercock, told the New York Post. “The owner is not entitled to collect rent and my clients are not required to pay rent.”
Yet, Harry Shapiro, a lawyer for the landlord, told the tabloid that the couple should pay, since the law only applied to buildings with three residential tenants or more.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments