Muslims sue Michigan town that refused permission for a mosque
Officials in Sterling Heights claimed their unanimous decision was based on concerns about traffic
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When officials in Sterling Heights voted 9-0 to refuse permission to build a mosque last summer, they said they had done so over concerns about traffic.
But many in the Michigan community suspected a more sinister motive.
Now, the community has filed a lawsuit, accusing the officials of discrimination after uncovering emails that showed officials talked of their fears abut being investigated because the mosque leaders might be “terrorists”
At the same time, it has emerged that federal prosecutors and the Department of Justice are investigating whether the mosque was treated fairly.
“With a vociferous and racist member of the Planning Commission leading the charge, the Planning Commission voted to reject the site plan,” said the lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Detroit on Wednesday.
“With no other choice, the American Islamic Community Centre has filed this suit seeking equitable relief to build the mosque and seeks damages as the City of Sterling Heights’ conduct violates, among other things, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalised Persons Act…and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
The Detroit Free Press said that summer, city officials and local residents said the decision to oppose the mosque was based on concerns that the location was not suitable for such a large building and could cause traffic problems.
In the lawsuit, the American Islamic Community Centre accuses the city of being biased against Muslims. In one email it cites, a police official asks whether the FBI can be contacted to see whether the mosque leaders are “on their radar”.
The mayor of Sterling Heights, Michael Taylor, has so far declined to comment.
US Attorney Barbara McQuade said on Wednesday: “The Department of Justice and US Attorney's Office have been conducting an independent investigation, and that investigation is ongoing.”
The main lawyer in the case, Azzam Elder, said in a statement: “We all know of a time in our history when sentiments in America were anti-Catholic, anti-Jewish, anti-German, anti-Japanese, or anti-Black, and those times have forever stained on our history.
“As defenders of the US Constitution, we are confident that there will come a day when it will also be inconceivable to be anti-Muslim. This is why we filed this lawsuit, in order to continue the struggle of protecting the rights of all minority groups in America.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments