Militia members accused of plot to kidnap Michigan governor lose bid to dismiss charges over entrapment claims
The men will have to prove they had no inclination toward extremist action if they hope to have the charges dismissed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge has refused to dismiss the indictments against a group of right-wing gang members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
The five men, who are described as "militia members," claimed they were entrapped by federal agents, and asked to have the charges against them dismissed. The men are charged with attempting to kidnap Ms Whitmer. One of the men reportedly said they wanted to hog-tie her and display her in public.
On Tuesday, US District Judge Robert Jonker said that the defense's arguments and claims that the government overreached in its prosecution of the men was a "heavy burden to carry."
The men are scheduled to stand trial in two months, and have been charged with conspiracy to kidnap and weapons of mass destruction charges. If convicted, they could face life in federal prison.
The Detroit News reports that Mr Jonker is requiring the men to show evidence that FBI agents and informants pushed them to commit the crimes with which they are charged. In addition, they have to show a "patently clear absence" of evidence that they had no intention of committing their alleged crimes.
If the judge had agreed to dismiss the charges, it would have effectively dismantled the government's case against the alleged conspirators.
The men's defense lawyers claim that FBI agents capitalised on right-wing anger with Ms Whitmer's Covid-19 restrictions, using the anger to to spur the men into taking extremist actions.
Government agents had infiltrated the group during the planning phase of the kidnapping. The defense will argue that those men ultimately pushed the defendants into action, while prosecutors will argue that the defendants were already inclined toward domestic terrorism.
Attorneys on each side of the trial are fighting over what evidence can be admitted into the trial, including details of the lives of the undercover FBI agents outside of their involvement in the kidnapping plot.
Defense attorneys want to include a private intelligence business owned by one of the FBI agents in the trial, arguing that it undermined the "good faith and integrity of the investigation," according to BuzzFeed. The defendants argued that the agent's side business represents an "apparent conflict of interest."
The defense attorneys have argued that the agent's side business provided him a financial motive to ensure that the five men would carry out the kidnapping plot, claiming he "was attempting to leverage his success in criminal investigations performed for the FBI for his personal profit".
Prosecutors argued against the inclusion of the agent's business in the trial and said they did not plan to call the agent to testify during hearings.