Miami dentist accused of leaving part of a tool inside a patient’s tooth during root canal
The patient was receiving root canal treatment at the time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Miami-Dade, Florida dentist has been accused of leaving part of a hand file inside a patient’s tooth during a procedure.
According to a state complaint filed against the dentist, Alberto Graupera stopped a root canal mid-way through the procedure at the request of the patient. He closed up the tooth, and did not tell the patient that part of a hand file remained inside, reports The Miami Herald. The incident occurred in September 2020.
The state complaint alleges the dentist, Mr Graupera, violated the minimum standard of care during the treatment.
The Florida Department of Health’s administrative complaint filed against the license of Mr Graupera claims that there was a disagreement between the patient and the dentist over the best course of action on the patient’s tooth.
Mr Graupera advised extraction and an implant, but the patient wanted to try a root canal to save the tooth.
According to the complaint filed earlier this month: “While [Graupera] performed the root canal, a hand file separated in tooth No. 31. [Graupera] did not notify Patient J.V. of the hand file separation in tooth No. 31.”
The complaint says Mr Graupera then perforated that tooth.
“Patient J.V. became upset during the procedure and expressed a desire to seek a second opinion,” the complaint says. “[Graupera] placed a seal on the incomplete root canal and Patient J.V. did not return to [Graupera].”
According to The Miami Herald, a member of staff at Dr Dina and Associates in Tamarac told a reporter that Mr Graupera worked there currently. It is unclear where he was employed at the time of the reported incident.
An endodontist later “identified a retained hand file instrument” near the tip of the tooth’s root “as well as the perforation of the floor of tooth No. 31’s pulpal chamber”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments