Mexican authorities pronounce 43 missing students dead but parents reject murder theory
Only one victim of the alleged massacre in Iguala has been identified
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The 43 students abducted by police in Mexico have been officially declared dead for the first time, despite the fact that remains of only one person have been identified.
Parents accuse the government of trying to close an investigation that has implicated security forces, the army and a mayor in a case that shocked the world.
Mexico’s Attorney General, Jesus Murillo Karam, told families of the missing students that their children had been rounded up by police and handed over to a drug gang, who murdered them and incinerated their bodies at a rubbish dump, mistaking them for rival cartel members.
“The evidence allows us to determine that the students were kidnapped, killed, burned and thrown in the river,” said Mr Murillo.
In emotional scenes at Tuesday night’s conference in Guerrero state, relatives rejected the theory which was first put forward two months ago, with some believing the students could still be alive.
“We don't believe anything of what they say,” said Carmen Cruz, mother of missing 19-year-old Jorge Cruz. “We are not going to allow this case to be closed.”
Mr Murillo said evidence of petrol, diesel and burnt rocks and steel from the inside of tyres at the scene proved the theory and that the fire was hot enough to burn all 43 bodies to ashes - a claim that has been disputed by Mexican scientists.
Remains found in bags in a river had traces of the dump where the fire occurred but scientists who conducted forensic testing on the ashes at a specialist laboratory in Austria only identified one victim, Alexander Mora.
It was impossible to identify the other remains, they said.
Lawyer Vidulfo Rosales, who is representing the families of the students from a rural teaching college, presented a 10-point argument for the investigation to continue, including a lack of conclusive forensic results.
A number of key suspects remain at large, who said, who could shed new light on the official version of events on the night of 26 September.
Mr Rosales said the families would be presenting a formal complaint to the Committee on Enforced Disappearances at the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights next week.
The Mexican government “will have to respond for these events,” he added.
The Attorney General’s conclusion was based in part on the testimony of a suspect arrested two weeks ago who told police he was called to “get rid” of the students.
Felipe Rodriguez Salgado, otherwise known as “El Cepillo”, is member of the Guerreros Unidos gang who is alleged to have taken part in the kidnapping, murder and disappearance of the students.
But the families have cast suspicion on his testimony, as well as that from other criminals, pointing to incentives to lie for plea deals and cut sentences, as well as the history of torture within the Mexican police.
“A criminal's word cannot be worth more than ours,” Mrs Cruz said.
There have so far been 39 confessions, 386 declarations, 487 forensic tests, 16 raids and two reconstructions as part of the investigation, with 99 detained, including the former mayor of the city of Iguala, Jose Luis Abarca.
Earlier this month, a student from the group who escaped the massacre implicated the army in the disappearance but Mr Murillo denied that soldiers participated in the killings or allowed them in any way.
The Mexican government had questioned, but not charged, 36 soldiers, and relatives have demanded access to army barracks in the area where they believe the students may have been taken.
Its latest explanation is unlikely to quell the controversy that has caused widespread protests in the last four months and forced a nationwide show of a crackdown on crime.
On Monday, relatives of the students led a huge march in Mexico City demanding government action and concrete proof of what had happened.
The motive for the alleged murders continues to raise questions, with the Attorney’s General claim the students were mistaken for rival gang members contradicts the testimony of suspects who said they knew they were students.
There is no known reason for the Guerreros Unidos targeting the group from the Raúl Isidro Burgos Rural Teachers' College of Ayotzinapa, which has a tradition of left-wing political activism.
They travelled to Iguala and commandeered a number of buses as part of a protest but were intercepted by local police on the journey who allegedly shot at them before rounding them up and driving them away in police cars. They were never seen again.
“We know the who, the what, the when and the where. We don't know the why,” said analyst Alejandro Hope. “They have yet to tell a compelling story of why this happened. It doesn't matter how many people they detain - unless they answer that question, the whole thing will remain under a halo of mystery.”
Additional reporting by AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments