Judge orders man convicted of statutory rape to stop having sex until he’s married
'If you’re ever on probation with this court, a condition of that will be you will not have sexual relations with anyone except who you’re married to, if you’re married,” rules Judge Stoker
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge has ruled that a man convicted of rape cannot have sex with anyone until he is married.
Cody Duane Scott Herrera, 19 and from Twin Falls, Idaho, was sentenced to a period of five to 15 years in prison last week after pleading guilty to the statutory rape of a 14-year-old girl in March 2015 — with the possibility of the sentence being suspended if he successfully completes a year-long therapeutic prison programme.
In an unusual proclamation, the judge then added that, should the defendant complete the programme and be released on probation, he would not be permitted to have sex with anyone unless he is married to them, according to the Idaho Times-News newspaper.
Judge Randy Stoker, told Mr Herrera in court: "If you’re ever on probation with this court, a condition of that will be you will not have sexual relations with anyone except who you’re married to, if you’re married.”
The fifth district judge reportedly explained that the condition would be put in place in part because Mr Herrera told pre-sentence investigators he had had 34 sexual partners. “I have never seen that level of sexual activity by a 19-year-old,” Judge Stoker added.
Lawyers and legal scholars are now debating whether Judge Stoker's conditions will be legally enforceable, with some claiming it breaches constitutional rights.
Shaakirrah Sanders, an associate professor at the University of Idaho’s College of Law, told Times-News: “I would suspect a judge can’t do that. I think it infringes on his constitutional rights.”
Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs meanwhile told the newspaper he believed Judge Stoker would be able to impose the probation condition, on the grounds that it is a move to keep the defendant from "committing another offence."
Mr Loebs pointed out that abstaining from alcohol was a condition of many probation orders. He said: “The judge has the ability to tell people to do or not do all sorts of things that are [otherwise] legal and constitutional.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments