Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Man who won $80m in the lottery must give half of winnings to estranged wife

Couple has been fighting over the money for six years 

Chelsea Ritschel
New York
Friday 21 June 2019 12:34 EDT
Comments
The winnings were deemed 'marital property' (Stock)
The winnings were deemed 'marital property' (Stock)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A man who won $80m playing the lottery while going through divorce proceedings will be required to give half his winnings to his ex-wife, a court has ruled.

Richard Anthony Zelasko, 50, has been told he must split the money with his estranged wife Mary Elizabeth, 48, after an arbitrator deemed the winnings part of the “marital estate”.

The couple, from Pontiac, Michigan, were married from 2004 until September 2011, at which point Elizabeth filed for divorce, according to court documents.

Two years later, Zelasko won an $80m Mega Millions lottery jackpot, which amounted to $38m after taxes and deductions.

Despite being separated at the time the ticket was purchased, the arbitrator deemed the winnings should be shared jointly because “that was probably not the first lottery ticket that defendant purchased during the marriage, and ‘as losses throughout the marriage were incurred jointly, so should winnings be shared jointly’”.

According to court documents, Elizabeth earned between $100,000 and $120,000 annually while Zelasko earned $36,000 annually during their marriage.

The documents also state Zelasko did not contribute any of the money from his winnings towards care for the couple’s three children prior to being required to do so.

In 2013, Elizabeth was awarded $15m of the lottery winnings, and in 2014, child support payments of more than $7,000.

However, after the original arbitrator died in 2014 before issuing the final award, Zelasko attempted to appeal the decision - at which point a substitute arbitrator was appointed and the decision upheld.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The decision of the first arbitrator was again upheld by the Michigan Court of Appeals on 13 June 2019, after Zelasko attempted to appeal the decision a second time.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in