Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Los Angeles voters to decide on mandatory condom use in porn films

 

Rob Williams
Friday 06 July 2012 10:35 EDT
Comments
Voters in Los Angeles county are set to vote on whether or not actors in porn films should be required to wear condoms.
Voters in Los Angeles county are set to vote on whether or not actors in porn films should be required to wear condoms. (GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Voters in Los Angeles county are set to vote on whether or not actors in porn films should be required to wear condoms.

A ballot measure will be put to voters during November's elections.

Election officials said the measure had gathered sufficient signatures in order to be put to the vote.

The measure is an attempt by the campaign groups, including the Aids Healthcare Foundation (AHF), to expand a county level ordinance requiring condom use as a condition of being given a filming permit within LA.

The county level ordinance is still under discussion as officials consider how to implement the law.

Around 370,000 signatures were submitted by supporters of the new initiative - far in excess of the number required to force a vote. However, the move has faced opposition.

Speaking to the Los Angeles Times a spokeswoman for the Free Speech Coalition, a porn industry pressure group, said the proposed measures “were clearly the government interfering where it really doesn't belong.”

A number of adult production companies have threatened to move from California because of the new requirement. In the past porn film production in the area has been suspended because of Aids scares.

However, Michael Weinstein, president of Aids Healthcare Foundation one of five groups which spearheaded the poll push - said,

"You really couldn't ask for a better opponent than porn producers.

Any amount of money they spend (to defeat the measure) would backfire because people have a low opinion of porn producers."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in