Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Locals doubt Exxon claim on Yellowstone oil spill's impact

 

Guy Adams
Monday 04 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments
(AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The oil company Exxon Mobil faced a mixture of scepticism and outright hostility yesterday after its president claimed that no wildlife had been harmed in an accident which saw an estimated 1,000 barrels of crude oil spilled directly into one of the most scenic waterways in the American West.

A pipeline in rural Montana ruptured on Friday night, sending an estimated 42,000 gallons of oil into the Yellowstone River. Although the leak was stopped after just six minutes, locals in the region cast doubt on claims by Exxon's Gary Pruessing that damage had been limited to a ten-mile stretch between the towns of Billings and Laurel.

Mr Pruessing further upset locals by telling reporters that no injured wildlife had yet been found. Brian Schweitzer, Montana's Democratic Governor, said the oil company could not be sure of the impact of the spill because it had not yet used boats to access most of the affected region.

"For somebody to say at this early stage that there's no damage to wildlife, that's pretty silly," Mr Schweitzer said. "Otherwise we would just allow rivers to have oil in them all the time. The Yellowstone River is important to us. We've got to have a physical inspection of that river in small boats – and soon."

The spill – downstream from the famous Yellowstone National Park – may have been caused by unseasonably high river levels putting pressure on the pipeline. Exxon admitted that it had closed the pipeline in May, but recently allowed it to re-open after deciding the water appeared to have passed its high point. Mr Pruessing claimed conditions nonetheless made the spill less serious than it might sound. "The turbulence of the river is going to break (the oil) apart and move it in a lot of different directions," he said.

Exxon is paying for 120 clean-up workers to remove oil from sections of river which are immediately accessible, using absorbent pads and booms. But locals say the spill could seriously compromise valuable farmland.

Alexis Bogonofsky, who farms goats in the affected region, told the Los Angeles Times that he had already noticed the spill's impact. "Places where the water has gone down the soil is shiny, there's residue oil and you can see where the grass is already dying," he said. "I'm really concerned about the wildlife. I've seen Canada geese try to take off and they can't get lift because of oil on their wings."

An oil executive's worst nightmare

* There is no good place to spill 1,000 barrels of crude oil, but given its place in the national psyche, you'd be hard-pressed to pick many worse places for a corporation to despoil than the Yellowstone River.

A scenic tributary of the Missouri river which tumbles in waterfalls through its namesake national park before crossing the plains of Wyoming and Dakota, it is famed for producing some of the best wild trout fishing in the world. The Yellowstone has also survived the march of modernity, which has seen many other picturesque rivers spoiled to produce electricity or drinking water. Today, it lays claim to the title of being the longest undammed watercourse in the lower 48 states.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in